Hicks: I was shutdown and removed from the meeting

August 4th, 2017    Author: Administrator    Filed Under: Opinion

I am Chris Hicks. I live at 444 Woodwick Court, Cincinnati Ohio 45255.

At the end of the July 26, 2017 Commissioner’s meeting, Commissioner Uible opened the floor saying “We are at the public participation section of the meeting. Any public participation.” When I attempted to exercise not just my 1st and 14th Amendment rights but the fundamental right of a citizen to petition government for redress of grievances without fear of reprisal, I was shut down and removed from the meeting. That was a violation of ORC 2921.45, it is contrary to the Ohio Attorney General’s yellowbook (pages 97 and 98), and it is likely a serious breach of 42 U.S. Code § 1983. You, my elected officials, acting in concert, seek to suppress factual and damaging information from public visibility. As I was going to say then, and I say now, I am committed to being here whenever I can to present updates on that you seek to hide and to exercise my rights you seek to crush. It is now 52 days since Mr. Uible offered meetings and 21 days since Mr. Painter read a letter promising an open discussion to which you all signed on. You continue to betray your own words.

Chris Hicks, a Union Township resident, was escorted out of a Clermont County Board of Commissioners session on July 26, 2017 by a sheriff's deputy, because President David Uible said, "I don't feel you have anything to add that we're working on that's germane to the commissioners."

I will continue to seek redress of very specific grievances such as: (1) Transparency on the plan to subsidize pro sports and (2) for Mr. Uible to eliminate his conflicts of interest by wearing only one hat, and (3) the immediate depoliticization of the CVB, and (4) transparency on the CVB. Now, let me address the three biggest areas of grievance for which I seek redress:

First: I have found that on August 20, 2012, Mr. Uible orchestrated a county takeover of the CVB by replacing 5 CVB board members at once to create an immediate majority under the control of County government that acted almost immediately to dismiss long-serving CVB staff. Those appointments were odd to say the least. The Auditor and Deputy Auditor were appointed to a CVB board that receives and disburses taxpayer funds from the Auditor’s office (nearly $700k in 2016). Mr. Uible voted to appoint himself to the CVB Board and he did so again on September 3, 2014. Not a single hotelier, restaurateur, venue operator or retailer serves on the CVB board. What is the point? The CVB is wholly controlled and almost wholly funded by tax revenue spent in secret from the public yet seeks to claim it is independent. Those are grievances for which I seek redress.

Second: I have been told by a first-hand source that the secret plan was first laid out on February 15, 2017 at the Port Authority Board meeting. I am told that an executive session was called and led by Mr. Uible, who is not a member of the Board, at which time he laid out his plan to use the CVB and Port Authority to execute the secret plan, outside public visibility, using the CVB to avoid open meetings and records laws. Despite repeated requests, I cannot even get a response on my request for draft minutes from a meeting that took place 168 days ago. But, that is like the County and CVB ignoring my requests to see the CVB by-laws or any evidence of a valid non-disclosure agreement. Those are grievances for which I seek redress.

Third and last: I had the honor of meeting the hotel manager Mr. Uible threatened in writing to me and verbally to him for not supporting Mr. Uible’s 1% tax scheme. The evidence of the threat is plain in Mr. Uible’s own writing but I found the manager’s story highly credible; he has witnesses and he provided some emails that set the timeframes.

Why is the threat to destroy the livelihood of this private employee not being investigated now over 80 days since it became known and almost 60 days since Mr. Uible put it in writing to me? The lack of action on potentially criminal acts by Commissioner Uible is another grievance for which I seek redress.

Last week, Mr. Uible spoke for all of you when he said: “We decided you cannot say what you are going to say.” That violation of my fundamental rights, in a declared public participation portion of the meeting with me being the only public person in the room and supported by Mr. Painter and Mr. Humphrey, has caused attention outside our area and offers of assistance. Gentlemen, I will continue to try to exercise my rights as a citizen and I will continue to express fact-based grievances. You have the power to address them. You set the course from here.

Thank you.

SHARE: share on facebook share on digg share on linkedin share on stumbleupon email to a friend

One Response to “Hicks: I was shutdown and removed from the meeting”

  1. Christian gaitskill says:

    What the hell are you talking about?? You go from Pro sports to CVB. Define your abbreviations!! I’d be inclined to back you but hell, I don’t know what you’re talking about!

Leave a Reply

  • public notices